Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Lenovo at Educause 2009

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

EDUCAUSE-Logo

We are getting excited to see everyone from higher education at the 2009 Educause Annual Conference in Denver. There are a number of programs and products that we’ll be featuring at the event. We’re in booth 614.

Here’s a run down:

New All-in-One enterprise desktop: ThinkCentre A70z
Be among the first to see and use the 2.4″ thick 16:10 all-in-one desktop which announces on Monday, November 2. A mysterious photo of this product can be found here. If you have a library, lab or health system (and I know you do), this is definitely worth a test drive.

The Lenovo Education Research Initiative
Lenovo’s global research plans for innovation in higher education through technology will be revealed in detail for the first time. This program was announced in June at ThinkTank 09.  Be sure to join us at ThinkTank 2010 at Babson this June.

Lenovo Enhanced Experience for Windows 7
In our spotlight display, we’ll be highlighting how Lenovo recorded the amazingly fast boot times running Windows 7, and will be showing off our new touch interface, SimpleTap.

Campus WiMax
Want to learn more about Northern Michigan University’s deployment of a private WiMax network on their campus and the metro-Marquette, MI area? We’ll have experts on hand to describe their rollout, as well as discuss all things hockey.

New Netbooks
Netbooks were very popular at last year’s conference. This year, we’ll be showing off the new Ion-powered IdeaPad S12, as well as the S10-2, the follow-on to the hugely popular S10. As usual, we’ll also be giving some away at the show.

Workstations
We’ll have the ThinkPad W700ds, and the ThinkStations S10 and D10 on hand running Adobe CS4 and other applications in the booth. If you haven’t seen the crazy screen on the W700ds, it is worth a gander – definitely a different experience seeing it live.

ThinkPad University
Now in its 16th year of providing ubiquitous access to students and faculty, ThinkPad University remains the gold standard for 1:1 computing in higher education.

We’ll see you in Denver!

Rutherford LEAP: Changing the game

Monday, September 21st, 2009

The 21st century skills movement is accelerating across the world.  Some projects are on a very large, national scale, others are on a local scale.  Both are equally important to education reform.  In the United States, we have a massively decentralized education system, with each state setting standards and assessments for students.  Only when students take high-stake tests like the SAT or ACT, do college admissions officers get a view of nation-wide assessment of common skills.  Some people believe that these tests and their impact create a deeply-flawed system (people like me).  The assessment game may need to change to become more accurate and fair.

Education reform in the United States must start at both the national and local level if it is to be successful.  Large and small heroic districts like Daviess County, San Diego Unified and Gwinnett County are leading the charge.  One especially progressive program is located in Rutherford County, Tennessee.  Through the Rutherford LEAP program, every 7th grader will get their keys to the digital world, an individualized portal to their future through an innovative 1:1 program.

rutherford leap

“The mission of RutherfordLEAP is to assist children in the Rutherford County school system to leap forward into the 21st century through the use of technology on a regular basis in the classroom. The goal of the program is to provide every seventh grader in the Rutherford County school system with a laptop computer that will be used as a supplemental learning tool in the classroom through the twelfth grade.  The essential elements the laptops offer the students are: Internet research, spreadsheets, word processing, and presentation skills.  Proficiency in these skills will enable the students to be competitive in today’s work force.”

Joining me today is Sara Brody, Director of Rutherford LEAP.

SCHMEDLEN: Sara, it sounds like there is a lot of excitement in Rutherford County!

BRODY: Thanks, Mike!  I am honored to speak with you.   There sure is a lot of excitement in Rutherford County!  Seventh and eighth graders at Kittrell School in Readyville, Tennessee are participating in a two-year pilot program, in which they use laptops or netbooks throughout the school day to enhance school curriculum.   It is Rutherford LEAP’s goal to help the Rutherford County school system establish a robust 1:1 laptop program so that every seventh grader entering school each year (approximately 3,000 students annually) will be given a laptop to use through twelfth grade.  It’s true that this is a progressive program; few public schools have the resources to equip their students in this manner.  We consider classroom technology to be an essential tool for success, not a privilege.

SCHMEDLEN: How did the idea of 1:1 evolve?

BRODY: The idea of a one-to-one laptop program evolved when my husband, Ira, and a Murfreesboro-based friend, Nate Schott, were discussing the fact that $15 million dollars in expenses faced the county school system for new school libraries and research materials.  Libraries are certainly important resources; however, Ira and Nate believed students could access information quickly and efficiently, if they only had individual laptops or netbooks.  Ira mentioned their conversation to me, and thinking about individual technology tools progressed from “it would be great if only…” to “why don’t we?”

I had worked for many years as a project manager, most recently in the technology division of a major corporation.   I loved my work, but I’d always had the desire to form a non-profit organization and to contribute to the world in that way as well.  My lifelong passion for learning and education, coupled with the desire to contribute to my community, helped me realize what I was meant to do.  My technology and project management background made developing our organization a natural fit for me.
We approached the county schools’ director with the idea.  With his approval, I worked with an enthusiastic group of educators in the county administration office over a period of about five months.  During this time, we discussed, molded, and finally developed the concept into a two-year pilot program.  Ira and I donated the first 110 laptops, and the program began in September 2008 with 110 seventh-and eighth-graders at Kittrell School in Readyville, TN.

SCHMEDLEN: Was the curriculum reworked to accommodate all of the new devices?

BRODY:
That’s a great question.  Although Rutherford LEAP participates in many facets of the planning process, we are not involved in creating curriculum.  Amy Blanton, Rutherford County’s Coordinator of Technical Instruction, and her team were instrumental in this area.  The curriculum remained unchanged.  However, strategies for content delivery were modified.
For instance, with the use of the laptops, teachers began to allow students to do more research and investigation in small, collaborative groups.  The groups then delivered information to their peers utilizing multi-media presentations.  The students are learning practical applications of technology in academic and potential work settings, which we believe prepares them for successful futures.

SCHMEDLEN: What is the Professional Development strategy for the teachers?

BRODY: In early 2008, teachers met and began to develop ideas for incorporating the new technology into their classrooms.  This collaboration and training continued throughout the school year during their common planning times, after school, and on scheduled in-service days. Kris Marshall, middle-level Instructional Technology Specialist, designed materials and led these sessions. The group met in the spring for a full day of training and a “debriefing”.  Two of the teachers were part of new teacher training, so they received an additional two days of training for integrating technology into the curriculum.

As the program expands, additional training for teachers will be provided.  Dr. H. Willis Means is an Associate Professor in the Elementary and Special Education Department at the largest university in the state, Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU), which is located here in Murfreesboro.  Dr. Means has begun to collaborate with the Rutherford County Board Of Education and Rutherford LEAP on how his department can assist with additional professional development for teachers, as well as instructional tools for students.  It’s all very exciting!

SCHMEDLEN: Rutherford LEAP is a 501(c)3.  Are you an NGO, a charity?  What is the connection with the school system?

BRODY: Rutherford LEAP (Learning Educational Advancement Program) is a non-profit charity and IRS-approved 501(c)3 created to raise funds for the purchase of computers for students in the Rutherford County school system,  in order to establish a 1:1 laptop program.

With the help of generous donations from individuals, foundations, local businesses and corporations, LEAP has been able to purchase laptops, and give them to the Rutherford County school system, which issues them to the students currently participating in the program.

Unfortunately, most public school systems are unable to provide each student with a netbook/laptop to fully establish a 1:1 technology program.  LEAP assists the county by providing the funding for the program, and by initiating the purchase of the technology.  The technology choices are a collaborative effort between the county and LEAP.

The laptops/netbooks are teaching tools used to implement the state’s learning initiatives; LEAP does not participate in the teaching portion of the process.  We have excellent teachers in the school system here; LEAP simply helps equip students with the tools they need.  The response from teachers in the program has been extremely positive.

SCHMEDLEN: Was it easier to achieve consensus as a non-profit entity than, say, a school superintendent or teacher’s union?

BRODY: In any situation, achieving consensus with a group can be a delicate task if the entire team is not “on board”, and working toward the same goal.  Perhaps I should explain that I have never been a teacher, a union member, or a school superintendent.  Therefore, I can only speak from my 22 years of work in the “for-profit” realm, managing projects in the investment banking world.

I have had the most wonderful experiences working collaboratively with the Rutherford County administrative team from the board of education office, as well as with the Kittrell School principal and teachers.   This intensely dedicated group of professionals is so “in sync”, in terms of desire to provide the best educational environment for students, that achieving consensus has never been an issue.  Each of us brings his or her own area of expertise to the table that is respected; out of this mutual respect, the group works together very well!  It’s a wonderful process.

SCHMEDLEN: What are the hopes for this program?

BRODY: Ira and I have several “hopes” for the program.  First, we hope that the use of technology in the classroom will empower the students to become more excited about learning, and that through technology, they will “go” to places they’ve never been before:  exploring new subjects, learning about places they hope to visit in the future, and expanding the goals they set for themselves.

Further, we hope that the establishment of a 1:1 netbook/ laptop program in Rutherford County will be used as a pilot program for the entire state of Tennessee, so that, in the near future, all students in Tennessee public schools will receive a netbook/laptop to use in the classroom on a daily basis.  It is LEAP’s hope that the use of technology in education will be incorporated into the statewide curriculum.  In today’s digital world, computer proficiency is imperative for students to be successful, productive citizens in their professional and personal lives.

SCHMEDLEN: What are the metrics that you are tracking for the program?

BRODY: As a baseline to begin the process of measuring the success of Rutherford LEAP, the Rutherford County Board of Education team and LEAP will review the test scores of seventh- and eighth-graders who have participated in the LEAP program, versus those in a similar school who did not participate.  These results should be available for review by November of this year.

We want to insure that we meet our original goals and make a lasting impact on Rutherford County students.  Therefore, our program will be carefully expanded from 110 students in a K- 8 school during a two-year pilot program, to a middle school where the full scholastic results of 320 seventh graders can be followed.  As the new school year began in August, Rutherford LEAP and the Rutherford County Board of Education team are collaborating to establish a system to measure students’ academic results based upon Tennessee’s new curriculum.  Processes will be developed to measure

LEAP student performance will be measured against the performances of students who are not yet included in the program.  Some of the areas of consideration include:

•    Improvement in writing skills
•    Tracking attendance and behavior, such as the completion of homework on a timely basis
•    Reviewing a child’s yearly progress via the TVAS scores (Tennessee Value-Added System), a system designed to track a student’s growth from year to year in terms of how much academic progress was made by the student over the year.

Due to improvements in the standards of K-12 education in Tennessee, additional methods of tracking students’ improvements in Language Arts, Social Studies and Science, for example, will be visible via the New Strands research process.  This is under development by the state, and will be implemented during the 2010-2011 school year.  LEAP will work with the Rutherford County Board of Education team to incorporate this new information into its project evaluations.  Essentially, the metrics created to track the success of the Rutherford LEAP program will be measured against the scores of students who are not yet participating in the program.

SCHMEDLEN: Sara, thank you very much – I look forward to hearing about the outcomes as this program grows!

For more information on the Rutherford LEAP, http://www.rutherfordleap.org

Opportunities in the economic crisis

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

Around the world, schools are feeling the effects of decreasing revenues and increasing demands.  How will schools react?  Dramatically cutting programs and services is one route, but one that will ultimately lead to long-term stasis in improvement efforts.  As Tony Bryk contends, schools must pursue “twin goals:”

  • Improve Learning Outcomes
  • Improve System Efficiency

Both pursuits require a measured approach to resource allocation and funding.  Today’s difficult economic conditions for school budgets – many of which are based on real estate tax revenues – may seem like totally negative circumstances.  However, the current climate also presents great opportunities to strengthen schools.

keith2007web1To identify these opportunities, CoSN has created “A Guide to Technology Leadership in the Economic Crisis” called “Mastering the Moment.”  This guide provides expert analysis of K12 technology budgets, as well as prescriptive tactical and strategic responses.  CoSN CEO, Keith Krueger, joins me today to discuss this resource and the current state of K12 budgets.

SCHMEDLEN: Keith, I appreciate the time as we’re all gearing up for NECC.  Why did CoSN create “Mastering the Moment?”

KRUEGER: In the face of the most serious economic crisis in generations, K–12 school districts across the nation are paring their budgets and planning for austere revenue cycles.

The panic of the moment could make educational technology an easy target—and a casualty—of the economic crisis. CTOs and district technology leaders are being asked to reduce their budgets.  The goal of Mastering the Moment, is to help superintendents and CTOs/district technology leaders master this moment. The economic crisis actually presents not just challenges, but also tremendous opportunities to strengthen technology investments, operations, programs, plans, staffs and results.  Also, fiscal crisis give us the opportunity to try out some new things.  As they say in Washington, DC, “A crisis is a terrible thing to waste”.

SCHMEDLEN: Can you explain the tactical vs. strategic responses?  How have you defined each?

KRUEGER: Tactical are short term “efficiencies” which offer immediate ways to dampen the impact of budget cuts.  The toolkit gives a dozen ideas to get you started, ranging from looking at open source to reexamining warranties to leasing options to optimizing printers/copiers.  Strategic responses are really all about helping you position technology as strategic to the district’s mission.  For example, we explain how to understand and articulate the “value” of technology.  CoSN has developed a range of tools to help you determine the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), as well as determine the Value of Investment (VOI). 

We also point out some new investments that are worth the cost, even in times of tight budgets.  For example, using economic stimulus dollars to “green” your network will save you in the long term with energy costs.  Virtualization is not only a good thing to do for the environment, but lowers your energy costs – which could be put to use to decrease other budget shortfalls now and in the future.

SCHMEDLEN: Have you seen any significant increase in technology spending due to the ARRA/Stimulus legislation?  If so, in what areas are schools choosing to use this funding?

KRUEGER: The dedicated funding for education technology (Title IID, Enhancing Education Through Technology/EETT) is just starting to flow in July, so it is a bit early to tell.  We have been working hard to help school district technology leaders think strategically about where they should invest which will have long-term impact.  Certainly school districts should be carefully thinking about how they are spending this stimulus money since it is one-time funds intended to create jobs and stimulate the economy. 

SCHMEDLEN: What are the mission-critical technical resources at K12 institutions – human resources, software, hardware or infrastructure?

KRUEGER: Well, I think all of those factors need to work together if you want technology to really be mission critical.  The area that the average school district is most under-funding is probably the human resources to make it all work.  For example, a recent study showed that in education the average technican services 612 computers vs. 150 in private sector.  The survey also found that three-quarters of CTO’s do not have enough staff to implement new technologies and two-thirds do not have enough staff to integrate technology into classrooms or to plan for new technology.  Simply buying more stuff without providing the professional development and technical support dooms the investment to fail.

SCHMEDLEN: Who can access Mastering the Moment resources?

KRUEGER: We have a public version available on our website www.cosn.org – just click on the Initiatives tab and look for Mastering the Moment.  Of course, the really rich and deep resources are for members.  Hopefully if your readers are not yet members, they will check out all the benefits of joining.

SCHMEDLEN: Any comments on cloud computing, the rise of inexpensive netbooks and analytics tools?  Does this “perfect storm” scenario for systemic 1:1 across large systems seem imminent to you? (Shout out: Rene Descartes)

KRUEGER: Cloud computing is coming to K-12 and it will be in a big way.  That said, right now we are only starting to see the impact.  CoSN recently partnered with New Media Consortium to create the first-ever K-12 Horizon’s report on emerging technologies.  We identified it as a key trend in the two to three year horizon.  As far as low-cost net books and other new devices, we are seeing that as a huge trend in K-12 today.  Likewise, data-driven decision making and analytics tools continue to be moving us to a powerful way to individualize instruction.

SCHMEDLEN: Keith, thank you very much for your time.  CoSN is a fantastic organization.  Speaking of CoSN, where will the 2009 conference be held?  Where can people find more information on the event?

KRUEGER: We are back in Washington, DC (Feb. 28-March 2, 2010).  Our Call for Presentations is now open at www.cosn.org

SCHMEDLEN: Thank you, Keith, and happy NECC!

KRUEGER: My pleasure – and be sure to come by our  CTO Leadership Forum at NECC next Mon., June 29th which will focus on How 2 B a Disruptive Technology Leader!  Register at the CoSN website.

Virtual Schools: An Effective Solution?

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

Virtual schools are experiencing an explosion in size, interest and scrutiny.  Enrollment just hit 1 million students in the United States – they are no longer just for special-case scenarios.  While the benefits, especially to rural communities and facilities-challenged districts, are clear, many question the academic rigor of the learning process and social development of the students.  The rise of hybrid classes in undergraduate education and “four-day-a-week” secondary public schools further emphasize the growing demand for online learning and remediation.  Lenovo is currently researching outcomes in the field in Ireland, and we will add more projects over the next year.  I’ll share the results here when the studies are complete.

friend_bruce

To shed more light on this topic, I’ve asked Bruce Friend, Director of Curriculum Pathways at SAS Institute, to answer some questions regarding virtual schools.  I should add that Bruce has held executive management positions in both the Florida Virtual School and North Carolina Virtual School organizations, so he has seen it all from first establishing one of the largest virtual schools to state policy, standards and assessment.

SCHMEDLEN: Greetings, Bruce – How long have you been involved with virtual schools and online learning?

FRIEND: My adventures in online learning began in 1997 when I was selected as the first online social studies developer and teacher for a new program that became the Florida Virtual School (FLVS).  In subsequent years I became the Chief Operations Officer / Vice President at FLVS.  During my tenure, we grew from less than 100 student enrollments to over 70,000.  I have also served as the director of North Carolina’s state virtual program and in 2006 became the VP of the International Association for Online Learning.

SCHMEDLEN: Here is the big question: Do virtual schools work?

FRIEND: YES, online learning has proven to “work” regardless of how one defines that term.  Whether by providing access to courses students could not otherwise take or by measurements such as state and national standardized assessments, online learning meets the academic needs of students.  I should point out that not all virtual schools are structured in the same way.  Most programs are supplementary, meaning students continue full-time at their brick-and-mortar school but take additional coursework online.  Other programs are indeed full-time and even diploma granting.  In all cases, examples show that online learning allows students to achieve at similar or higher levels than traditional class environments.

SCHMEDLEN: Have there been any longitudinal assessments for graduates of virtual schools?  Is there a sense if they any better or worse off than traditional students in higher education of the workforce?

FRIEND: Given that even the most veteran online K12 schools are about a decade old, the body of research on the effectiveness of online learning is just beginning to form.  Nonetheless, several studies have provided evidence that students taking online course actually outperform their traditional-school counterparts.  One study, for example, focused on Spanish acquisition in an online environment in West Virginia.  In addition, online programs can also offer educational value to taxpayers as was highlighted in Florida by a TaxWatch report.  For a list of studies, go here.

SCHMEDLEN: Jim Goodnight, CEO of SAS, recently made a big announcement: SAS® Curriculum Pathways® is now free.  This is a very powerful collection of resources.  Can you tell me more about the product and why SAS made this decision?

FRIEND: SAS Curriculum Pathways provides interactive, standards-based resources in English, science, mathematics, social studies and Spanish for grades 8-12 in traditional, virtual and home schools. SAS focuses on topics where doing, seeing, and listening provide information and encourage insights in ways that conventional methods and textbooks cannot. SAS Curriculum Pathways is your online partner, engaging students with quality content that can be differentiated to meet their varied needs including learner-centered activities with measurable outcomes and interactive materials that target higher-order thinking skills. All materials are linked to state standards. Schools can also adapt the content to match their technological capabilities. The decision to make SAS Curriculum Pathways available at no cost to all US students and educators comes in response to the need for digital content resources that engage students and promote 21st-century skills. It is yet another example of strongly reaffirming the company’s more than 30-year commitment to education.

SCHMEDLEN: Speaking of interactivities, what is most important in an online learning environment: the instructor, the course management system, the content, the state standards, the assessment or something else?

FRIEND: In my experience, the most important component still remains the instructor.  While “online” may sound “high tech” for some, it is the “high touch” that makes the difference for students.  Effective teaching has always been about connecting with students.  Technology allows us to do this in ways that we could not have envisioned a decade ago.  Certainly you need high-quality, engaging online content, and you need the technology delivery system to connect this content to the students; however, a caring , passionate teacher is still crucial.

SCHMEDLEN: New South Wales just announced they will order approximately 220,000 IdeaPad netbooks.   That’s a lot.   Will the availability of less expensive mobile hardware make a profound impact on online learning?

FRIEND: Driving down the price of hardware can certainly have a positive impact on schools’ ability to acquire the latest technologies; however, hardware alone will not transform the way teaching and learning take place.  To complement that hardware, teachers need quality learning resources such as SAS Curriculum Pathways, and equally important, teachers need the ongoing professional development that will allow them to maximize the potential that both hardware and digital curriculum can provide to them and their students.  I think we will profoundly affect teaching and learning for the better, both in traditional and online classrooms, when we effectively provide teachers with hardware, digital content, training, and leadership support.

SCHMEDLEN: If you had one piece of advice to give nations, provinces, states or districts that plan to roll out online learning or virtual schools, what would it be?

FRIEND: Do not simply try to replicate the traditional classroom in a virtual environment.  Tens of thousands of students have consistently told us that a major reason they like online courses is that they are accessible at convenient times.  Still, new online programs are often asked to employ traditional mechanisms of school management (seat time over performance) and funding models.  In addition, online course content needs to be dynamic, interactive, and engaging.  Simply taking your text-based resources and turning them into an online course is not going to engage students.  The power of online learning is maximized when students can access learning 24/7 and work at their own pace on engaging courses that promote active learning.

SCHMEDLEN: Thank you!

For more information on Curriculum Pathways (it’s free!) visit www.sascurriculumpathways.com

Enhancing education through the innovative use of technology

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

picture-option-1Welcome to Lenovo Blogs: Education, where we will highlight innovations in education from content delivery to assessment to distance learning.  Subject matter experts such as teachers, professors, instructional technologists and cognitive psychologists will be asked to provide insight into education reform at global, national and local levels.  Comments and lively discussion are welcome.





This blog’s goals are:

-    Worldsource the best ideas in education from across the globe
-    Highlight innovations in teaching and learning
-    Enable a discourse on education reform

If you have put into practice an idea or innovation at your institution that you’d like to share with the community, please email me at schmedlen at lenovo.com